I just finished watching a video on
a friend's wall. It was the one about the professor who said to all his classes
God doesn’t exist and to prove it I’m going to drop a piece of chalk. You’ve
seen that one right? Anyway the basic story in this “video” (I use quotes
because it’s all text, and no actual “video” takes place) is that the professor
challenges anyone who believes in God to stand up. If any brave soul faced his
wrath, he would claim that God couldn’t exist. He would make the ridiculous
claim that, if He did exist, he would stop a piece of chalk from shattering
when it hit the ground, all at the command of the all-knowing college professor.
Finally, after years and years of this guy making a plethora of God-disproving
chalk marks on the ground, one kid stands up, and when the Professor drops the
chalk, it doesn’t break. The message is, “Stand up for your faith.” All in all,
a good little story that is most likely, in my opinion, stretched far from the
truth to be more dramatic than it actually was. But, we’ll forgive the makers
of this video for that because God doesn’t care if we lie in order to get
people to talk about Him, it’s only the end result He cares about (<- that’s
sarcasm for those who didn’t realize).
Here’s my main problem with this
“video” (as if lying in order to “inspire” weren’t enough). The last two
minutes and twenty seconds of this video are spent in “guiltifying” the viewer.
It starts by saying that the viewer has two options: one he can pretend he
never saw the video, or two, he can feel guilty enough to share it on his
facebook wall (that’s not verbatim by the way). The very obvious problem is that
there is a very obvious third option. You can contemplate what the video said
and learn something from it, without cluttering up facebook. You can choose to
say, “That was a pleasant video. I don’t think I enjoyed watching it enough to
actually make someone else sit through it for 6 minutes, but I think I have
learned something from this about standing up for my beliefs and defending them
when they’re attacked.” You could also say “Hmmm… that was a great video, I
think other people should see this video because they might also enjoy, and
possibly learn something from, it.” Unfortunately what most people end up saying
is, “Wow, I feel really guilty… I think I’m going to post this on my friends’
facebook walls, not because I actually want these people to hear the Gospel,
but because I feel guilty for not wanting to share this video.” This is the WRONG
response. This is not a good response to any video promoting any truth,
especially the truth of the Gospel. If the makers of this video had merely let
the truth and inspiration of the story stand on its own, there wouldn’t be any
guilt to begin with.
Many similar photos, videos, and
statuses have this common problem: the guilt factor. Somewhere in the piece of
media it is made clear that, if the viewer does not copy and paste it somewhere,
they are a less valuable human being, they are a human being who does not
follow their convictions, or they are a more cowardly human being than if they
do. Let me be clear right now: YOU DON’T HAVE TO SHARE THAT PICTURE UNLESS YOU
WANT TO. God doesn’t love you less because you didn’t copy a status onto your
timeline, Satan doesn’t like you more when you keep scrolling past a picture of
a bible verse, and Santa Clause will not put you on the naughty list for skimming
over video of a baby laughing. It has become a trend to write “Share this if
you agree” at the end of 50% of our facebook statuses, and it puts the reader
in a difficult, and annoying position.
This phenomenon also
taps into human nature, because every single person’s initial response to a
directive is to say “no.” It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy of making the reader
dislike the writer. I myself never forward posts of this nature and once in a
while the reason is simply the smug little thought, “You can’t tell me what to
do,” when in reality that thought shouldn’t have needed to enter my mind.
Whatever that piece of media was promoting should have been inspiring, or
funny, or important, or worthwhile enough to share purely because of its contents.
I realize the
irony of what I’m about to do, but I have copied a link to the specific video I
was ranting about in the first paragraph. I figured you might want to know
exactly what I was talking about. Through this irony I might have discovered a
way around the guilt factor. Just write a two-page paper talking about how you
don’t think we should guilt people into sharing videos before sharing the
video…. just an idea.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piuoGb-Nhfw
A liberal muslim homosexual ACLU lawyer professor and abortion doctor was teaching a class on Karl Marx, known atheist
ReplyDelete”Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship Marx and accept that he was the most highly-evolved being the world has ever known, even greater than Jesus Christ!”
At this moment, a brave, patriotic, pro-life Navy SEAL champion who had served 1500 tours of duty and understood the necessity of war and fully supported all military decision made by the United States stood up and held up a rock.
”How old is this rock, pinhead?”
The arrogant professor smirked quite Jewishly and smugly replied “4.6 billion years, you stupid Christian”
”Wrong. It’s been 5,000 years since God created it. If it was 4.6 billion years old and evolution, as you say, is real… then it should be an animal now”
The professor was visibly shaken, and dropped his chalk and copy of Origin of the Species. He stormed out of the room crying those liberal crocodile tears. The same tears liberals cry for the “poor” (who today live in such luxury that most own refrigerators) when they jealously try to claw justly earned wealth from the deserving job creators. There is no doubt that at this point our professor, DeShawn Washington, wished he had pulled himself up by his bootstraps and become more than a sophist liberal professor. He wished so much that he had a gun to shoot himself from embarrassment, but he himself had petitioned against them!
The students applauded and all registered Republican that day and accepted Jesus as their lord and savior. An eagle named “Small Government” flew into the room and perched atop the American Flag and shed a tear on the chalk. The pledge of allegiance was read several times, and God himself showed up and enacted a flat tax rate across the country.
The professor lost his tenure and was fired the next day. He died of the gay plague AIDS and was tossed into the lake of fire for all eternity.
Semper Fi.
p.s. close the borders
To say you can't use guilt in persuading others is to limit your toolbox. I get what you mean though, and it is a measure of respect. If you wanna see some other tools commonly used in group-think persuasion, you should read up on the cognitive neuroscience of religion. I've got some videos you can watch on it if you're interested. Just have to wade through the evolution talk, or replace with whatever you feel comfortable with saying.
ReplyDelete